|  
                
               Shavrov 
              Goes To Turkey August 2004
 N. N. Shavrov worked in Tiflis (Tblisi) in a regional headquarters 
              of the agriculture department of Imperial Russia. He was the expert 
              on Caucasia’s silk industry, his publications and books a 
              key source concerning that activity. He also was knowledgeable in 
              matters apian, writing on that subject as well.  Bureaucrats such as Shavrov with responsibility for supporting 
              the kustar’ (home craft) industry had a keen interest 
              in modernization; since such a large part of the population made 
              carpets and textiles, looms and designs were very much on the agenda 
              for change. Production on the one hand, marketing on the other. 
             So, in 1901 Mr. Shavrov betook himself to Anatolia, observed what 
              he could, gathered information, returned, and wrote a book.a 
               The book covers rug making beyond Anatolia, but only cursorily. 
              The Anatolia data are quite detailed – sizes, knot counts, 
              and the like. A person who knows the rugs and can handle the Russian 
              text may find it interesting.  One element, however, is readily accessible to all, the photographs 
              – bad as they are -- for the most part involving looms -- 
              are reproduced below. With one possible exception -- Brussa (aka 
              nowadays Bursa) -- the weaving location portrayal seems unexceptionable, 
              as does the list for wool dyestuffs except for reds: madder, cochineal, 
              as well as kermez (cherbets duba, oak tree worm, Coccus 
              ilicis).  There is some emphasis on Smyrna and identification of its weaving 
              nodes as Demirzhi, Ak-Hissar, Gordes, and Kula. Konia is apparently 
              next in significance with seven subsidiary centers the most important 
              of which is Zille with 130 working looms. Karaman (a broad geographic 
              term) is next in scale of production. Carpet-making in Brussa is 
              enigmatically noted as “not too few”, i.e. some, (ne 
              malo) and cited for its home weaving on the part of both Moslems 
              and Armenians.  The basis for the sketch map isn’t evident. The map is fairly 
              illegible even in the book and worse as reproduced here. The different 
              red tones reflect the degree of weaving activity, running from lightest 
              to darkest, as follows: “only weakly developed”, “developed”, 
              “industry is important”, “the principal region 
              of carpet-making”.  For an earlier but of the period snapshot of Smyrna and Ushak weaving, 
              see "The Smyrna Rug Trade".
 As for the pictures, locations are given, and one or two new designs 
              identified. 
     a N. 
              N. Shavrov, Kovrovoe Proizvodstvo b Maloi Azii, Tiflis, 
              1902.  For an earlier but of the period snapshot of Smyrna and Ushak weaving, 
              see "The Smyrna Rug Trade".
 
 |